Massachusetts School Library Association
            MEMBER PORTAL                
​Join or Renew     Member Directory​
  • Home
  • About Us
    • MSLA Leadership 2022-23
    • Executive Board Meetings
    • Joint Statements: MLA, MassCUE
    • Spotlight Archive
    • Strategic Plan 2016-22
    • MSLA Constitution
  • Membership
    • Member Portal
    • Join or Renew Your Membership
    • Members Map
    • Email List
    • Regions >
      • Boston
      • Northeast
      • Metrowest
      • Southeast
      • Central
      • West
  • Conference
    • MSLA and PDPs
  • Resources
    • DESE Rubric
    • Certification & Licensure
    • Program Standards & Rubrics
    • Job Description: School Librarian
    • Job Listings
    • MLS Strategic Planning
    • Intellectual Freedom
  • Advocacy
    • MA School Library Study for Equity & Access
    • Everyday Advocacy
    • ESSA
    • Exemplary Programs
  • Newsletter
    • 2022 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2022
      • May 2022
      • October 2022
    • 2021 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2021
      • May 2021
      • October 2021
    • 2020 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2020
      • May 2020
      • October 2020
    • 2019 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2019
      • May 2019
      • October 2019
    • 2018 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2018
      • May 2018
      • October 2018
    • 2017 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2017
      • May 2017
      • September 2017
      • October 2017
    • 2016 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2016
      • May 2016
      • October 2016
    • 2015 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • April 2015
      • November 2015
    • MSLA Forum 2002-2013
  • Awards
    • Judi Paradis Memorial Grant
    • Archive: History of Awards
    • 2019 Awards Pictures
    • 2018 Awards Pictures
    • 2017 Awards Pictures
    • 2016 Awards Pictures
    • 2015 Awards Pictures
  • Bookmark Contest
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2020 Winners
    • 2019 and 2018 Winners
    • 2016 and 2017 Winners
    • 2012 to 2015 Winners
    • 2009 to 2011 Winners
    • 2004 to 2008 Winners
    • Bookmark Judges

Why are the Civil Rights Books in the 300s instead of the 900s?

2/15/2022

8 Comments

 
Gillian Bartoo is the District Cataloger for Cambridge Public Schools in Cambridge, MA.  

Why do books about the struggle for civil rights in America end up in social sciences (3XX) rather than history (97X)?  The same way lots of books end up in “weird” places in school libraries: the original cataloger followed the rules for assigning Dewey call numbers. The most basic rule is that you catalog to describe the content of the book and to fit that content into an imaginary library of all published knowledge using the scheme Dewey laid out. It means catalogers don’t consider the intended audience, the context in which a work might be used, or where any given individual might expect to find it shelved. Often, this does not bode well for small, specialized libraries such as our school libraries which carry books with simplified content that caters to a young and still intellectually developing patron group. ​
In K-12 schools we tend to lump history and sociology together under the heading “Social Studies.” We consider these broadly with the same lens and expect resources about the covered subjects to fall together. At higher levels of education and research, this area of study breaks apart into separate disciplines and subdisciplines. The Dewey rubric caters to this finer level of academic nuance, and it is at that level that all Dewey numbers are assigned, including the ones for children’s books.

Dewey places works pertaining to civil rights under a sociological rather than an historical perspective and further divides out the civil and political rights of all (323) and the civil and political rights of “non-dominant groups” (323.1).  That, in a nutshell, is why your civil rights books are in 323.1.  There is no option in Dewey to class “civil rights” in “history”. There certainly is a longer discussion taking place about how the Dewey system consistently shows its 19th century, WASP-y bones by “othering” events and peoples that are not white and male, but that wide-ranging and nuanced discourse is for another column. Instead what I want to get at here is: can you move your civil rights movement books to 973.9?

Now, if you took a cataloging class in library school you probably got the impression that you absolutely cannot argue with Dewey and that placement of these books is THE RULE. You probably didn’t hear too much about the local option caveat which basically means if you want to catalog it in your own library another way, you should go for it.

So, do you dare disturb the Dewey universe?

Sure. I don’t care.

But… then again, I do. I have an opinion and it is that you should stick to Dewey whenever possible. But— I reiterate— that’s an opinion, not some rule enforced by Big Dewey who’s going to mark it down on your permanent record somewhere that you transgressed and are officially a bad librarian. However, before you grab your blank spine labels to exercise the local option on your collections, I want to lay out the reasons why I advise sticking with assigned Dewey whenever possible:


  • You may be bound by district / consortium agreement to accept assigned Dewey. Many districts and consortiums want to keep cataloging standardized across libraries to ease collection transfers, interlibrary loans, and patron use.
  • It’s less work for you, and saves time and money. You do not have to go through a recataloging project. You have not condemned yourself (and your successors) to original cataloging of whole sections of your library. You can buy pre-cataloged books from your vendors. With most of us already overburdened, think about this very carefully. Ask yourself: “What else could I do with the time I’m going to spend doing all this cataloging?” If the answer is: “teaching, planning, collaborating, advising readers, living life outside of work, etc…,” then setting yourself up for an on-going battle with Dewey is probably not a hill you want to die on.
  • Assigned Dewey is universal. If your goal is to teach your kids to be independent library users one of the ways to do that is teach them correct Dewey. Once they’ve got that under their belt, they can go into any Dewey-based school or public library and find what they want.  If you make up your own scheme the only thing your kids are going to learn is your scheme.
​
Curriculum units are not shelving schemes. The desire to shelve together all books for a curriculum unit is a strong one. But that is shelving to purpose and not content. That might be fine if curriculum (the purpose) never changed, but curriculum changes constantly, the content of a book does not. Save yourself the trouble of cataloging and recataloging things to fit the curriculum. Not all your books are there for curriculum purposes anyway. Instead, use online catalog collections and resource lists to group together titles for specific areas of interest or study units. It’s quicker and easier to add or remove books to these lists than recataloging physical books and it doesn’t matter what your shelving scheme is. It’s easier than trying to come up with a shelving format that fits a constantly moving target.

Where do you draw the line? Building and changing cataloging schemes involves a lot of forethought, even if you think it’s in just one small subject area. When we say “civil rights” books we generally mean the social movement around the civil rights of African Americans headed by Dr. King, but there are plenty of other “non-dominant” groups that have their own roles in American history. Women, the LGBTQ+ community, Native Americans, Chicanos, Asian Americans, and others all had their own civil rights movements. Are you going to recatalog their books too? There are other social movements, sociological phenomena, and “histories” that land in the 300s, or end up split between 3XX and 97X: immigrants, education, military history, industrialization. Should you move those too? How big is your history section going to get if you move all those books? Are you going to have to start subdividing (adding decimal places) to 973 to shelve it more coherently? In Dewey, 973 decimal breakdown is by date. A book about the Civil Rights Movement in the mid-20th century will sit in a different place than a book about civil rights concerns since founding. You will need to think carefully about what gets moved and why, and what gets left behind.

So what do you tell your third graders when they ask why the civil rights books aren’t in the “history”? To be honest, I don’t know exactly. I’m not very adept at whittling complex issues down to age-appropriate answers. What I’m hoping is that I’ve given you enough of an explanation as to why it happens that you can come up with better answers (and some lively classroom and collegial discussions) than I can on the issue.

In the hope of continuing such discussion, please add your comments or questions about cataloging below. I would love to hear from you!
8 Comments
Jen Mason Stott
2/15/2022 11:28:27 am

Great points, Gillian! Luckily(?) most school libraries are small enough that the walk from the 300s shelves to 900s is a matter of seconds. All the more reason to teach PAC skills to students. I'd rather spend my energy creating dynamic bibliographic tools, like book lists or Destiny Collections, so that I can easily print out lists to help me or others pull titles! Spending my time on recataloging puts the heavy lifting on location/"where it's shelved." Cataloging to meet a patron need assumes that said patrons will find those civil rights books by browsing the shelf. That's a heavy lift, considering how skinny and unhelpful the spines are to young readers! Thinking like a teacher, I'd rather have a curated list from a librarian than an eye-crossing shelf full of titles i know nothing about. Well, and a face-out bin of books never helps. (Am I showing my age with all the vision complaints? Ha ha.)

Reply
Tricia Svendsen
2/24/2022 02:41:21 pm

I wholeheartedly agree with you! There are so many things to consider, and some changes make sense. My elementary libraries had biographies about scientists in science. I moved them to 92. Some wild animal books came labeled for the 600s; I changed them to the 500s. There also animal books - endangered - in the 300s, and they belong there. Students who grasp Dewey will be equipped to navigate many libraries for many years.

Reply
Ann Niederkorn
2/27/2022 03:46:23 pm

As always, Gillian, I love hearing your take on these topics. You've definitely given me some good food for thought.

Reply
SHEILA M GERATY link
2/27/2022 05:26:59 pm

Hi, I have struggled with this issue and I am so glad to read your analysis. Absolutely makes sense and allows the time connecting with rather than redoing Dewey!

Reply
Jen Varney
3/10/2022 12:18:16 pm

Thank you for sharing your cataloging expertise with us!

Reply
Amy
3/16/2022 09:30:48 pm

Gillian is the best!

Reply
Jennifer Varney
3/24/2022 12:37:05 pm

Thanks for sharing your expertise with us, Gillian!

Reply
Barb Fecteau
11/16/2022 09:59:58 am

I have only been asking myself this question for 17 years. And the answer is so much richer and explains so much more about school library cataloging than I expected it to!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Forum Newsletter

    Co-Editors
    Reba Tierney and
    ​Luke Steere

    Reba is the School Librarian at Waltham High School; Luke is School Librarian at  Wilson Middle in Natick

    Click to set custom HTML

    Categories

    All
    AASL
    Academic
    Advocacy
    ALA
    Authors
    Book Trailers
    Censorship
    Column
    Conference
    Culture
    Databases
    Dewey
    Digital Citizenship
    E Books
    E-books
    Elementary
    ESSA
    Ethics
    Evaluation
    Inquiry
    Leadership
    Learning Commons
    Legislation
    Literacy
    Maker Space
    Nonfiction
    Orientation
    Planning
    PLN
    President's Remarks
    Professional Development
    Reading
    Science
    Secondary
    Standards
    Technology
    Union
    Volunteers
    Weeding

    Archives

    October 2022
    May 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    May 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    May 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    November 2015
    April 2015

    MSLA Forum Past Issues:
    January 2015
    April 2015
    ​
    2002-2015 MSLA Forum
The Massachusetts School Library Association  works to ensure every school has a school library program that is fully integrated at all grade levels across the curriculum and has a significant and measurable impact on student achievement….Read more…..and Learn more about MSLA

Contact MSLA:
Emily Kristofek, Office Manager/Event Planner
P.O. Box 336. Wayland, MA 01778
ekristofek@maschoolibraries.org
​
508-276-1697 

Massachusetts School Library Association. All Rights Reserved.  Copyright 2023.