Massachusetts School Library Association
            MEMBER PORTAL                
​Join or Renew     Member Directory​
  • Home
  • About Us
    • MSLA Leadership 2022-23
    • Executive Board Meetings
    • Joint Statements: MLA, MassCUE
    • Spotlight Archive
    • Strategic Plan 2016-22
    • MSLA Constitution
  • Membership
    • Member Portal
    • Join or Renew Your Membership
    • Members Map
    • Email List
    • Regions >
      • Boston
      • Northeast
      • Metrowest
      • Southeast
      • Central
      • West
  • Conference
    • MSLA and PDPs
  • Resources
    • DESE Rubric
    • Certification & Licensure
    • Program Standards & Rubrics
    • Job Description: School Librarian
    • Job Listings
    • MLS Strategic Planning
    • Intellectual Freedom
  • Advocacy
    • MA School Library Study for Equity & Access
    • Everyday Advocacy
    • ESSA
    • Exemplary Programs
  • Newsletter
    • 2022 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2022
      • May 2022
      • October 2022
    • 2021 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2021
      • May 2021
      • October 2021
    • 2020 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2020
      • May 2020
      • October 2020
    • 2019 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2019
      • May 2019
      • October 2019
    • 2018 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2018
      • May 2018
      • October 2018
    • 2017 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2017
      • May 2017
      • September 2017
      • October 2017
    • 2016 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2016
      • May 2016
      • October 2016
    • 2015 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • April 2015
      • November 2015
    • MSLA Forum 2002-2013
  • Awards
    • Judi Paradis Memorial Grant
    • Archive: History of Awards
    • 2019 Awards Pictures
    • 2018 Awards Pictures
    • 2017 Awards Pictures
    • 2016 Awards Pictures
    • 2015 Awards Pictures
  • Bookmark Contest
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2020 Winners
    • 2019 and 2018 Winners
    • 2016 and 2017 Winners
    • 2012 to 2015 Winners
    • 2009 to 2011 Winners
    • 2004 to 2008 Winners
    • Bookmark Judges

“Intertwining”: Purposely Adding  a “Value” Concept into Information Literacy

5/1/2018

0 Comments

 
Dr. Georgina Trebbe is the Information Specialist at Minnechaug Regional High School
and on the Adjunct Faculty of Library and Information Science at Simmons College.    

Educating and supporting school information literacy growth can be challenging for school library teachers. At the forefront of introducing tools to improve student information literacy skills growth are school library practitioners who have developed models and methods to support both the student and content educators’ understanding of information behaviors necessary to locate authoritative and relevant information. Yet, with all of published research, anecdotal evidence, and academic achievements of school library professionals, there remains a lack of educator and administrator awareness for the skills and knowledge contributions a school library teacher provides a given learning community. Rather than continuing the disconnect, the idea of “intertwining” utilizes the concept of “value” as a common goal by which all stakeholders; students, content educators, administrators, and the school library teacher can center information behaviors. Intertwining value into, not only the information behavior expectations of a school library program, but also the entire school’s teaching and learning sets a stronger foundation for building a school-wide information literacy program.
Collectively, the stakeholders, consisting of school librarians, educators, and students, all benefit from seeking, processing, and using authoritative and relevant information to build a final product. All value the information itself. Yet, these same stakeholders who value information have varied perspectives for how information literacy is understood, taught, and learned. School librarians understand information literacy as both a concept and method of practice. Utilizing published information literacy models to support the process for locating, evaluating, and using information properly, school librarians design lesson plans and supports to develop recontextualized and transferable information behavior skills. Depending on scheduling and/ or educator collaboration opportunities, school library teachers plan either separate or embedded classes, where the content educator carves out a section of time for information literacy to be taught.

Educators view information literacy as a concept without tangible points. Further complicating how educators view information literacy are their individual grade level and/ or content area perspectives. Educators often prefer to determine conceptual points collectively labeled as the “research process.” Limited by time constraints, educators often focus on the writing or the final product rather than the steps necessary to to produce a quality product. Unless working collaboratively, “research processes” between educators may lack consistency, leaving students to focus on each teacher’s process rather than the content. Without proper guidance, educator directions to “research” may be interpreted by students as “Go Google it.” Without proper guidance to plan for the location and evaluation of resources, students potentially can generate information that lacks the organization and authority to meet objective expectations, leaving an educator to wonder about the quality of student work.

Students are the most interesting stakeholders when it comes to understanding information literacy. Versatile by necessity, student experiences have allowed for self-practiced choices and methods for seeking information. Associating the word “research” with intense and agonizing work and writing, students have no connection to the term “information literacy.” Student searching is conditional. Students want to select the content, design their own search methods and have fast information results. Without guidance or a plan, students usually conduct social searches when a more academic plan for authoritative resources is necessary. Assigned topics are considered “boring.” Left without authoritative direction, students have no choice than to rely on each other to develop researching methods leading to the self- perception that their information behaviors are masterful and efficient. Without consistent grade level and context specific instruction, students have developed confidence in the search habits they share with each other. Yet, within a student’s self-confidence resides the unique opportunity to investigate when engaged. While adults may hesitate, students possess a willingness to search, a curiosity to dig deeper, and a fearlessness that even when a computer breaks & systems fail, they will find a way to persevere.

The commonality of Value connects the varied perspective of stakeholder perspectives. Each stockholder values the ability to search, the results, and potential uses of information. But is this enough? Can value be further unpack and the intertwined into the information behaviors present in the oscillatory steps of an information literacy model? Discovering the potential requires an unpacking of the concept of “value.” While many will define “value” as something important or having to do with principles, unpacking it requires we look to it conceptually.

Unpacked, Value is comprised of two parts, ethics and aesthetics. While the ethical part of value is well known in schools, the aesthetic is not as common. Ethical value places importance on the right and wrong of a situation, method, thought process, action and more. Often the choice made comes with consequences that can be known or unknown to the person. Correctly using and citing information reveals ethical value. Aesthetic value placed appreciation on the beauty or contributions of a given work. Creating a piece of work that shares authoritative and credible information reveals an appreciation for what the works contributes and the who created it.

Unpacked, both ethical and aesthetic value intertwined into each point of an information literacy model results in a consistent self-reflection that drives information behaviors. As students begin to develop a research plan as well as select tools, source locations, and relevant resources, intertwined should be constant value checking that questions if information found is being used and reflected in a piece of work properly? Are the author(s) of the work being appreciated and cited. Is the work created honoring those who will learn from it by passing along truthful information? To insure the student keeps value focal point, a goal then at each step of an  information literacy model students must have the opportunity to reflect and make adjustments. When all educators and school library teachers maintain, not necessary the same nuts and bolts of researching but the ethical and aesthetic value expected when engaged in information behavior, there is potential to change a community.

A community that intertwines value into its information behaviors develop students and educators who think of themselves as researchers who value the contributions of others; as authors who write in a clear organized manner using and citing the authoritative and the most relevant information; as publishers, who are confident the information selected is credible before it is submitted; and as educators, whose work presented to peers is truthful. When a community of people assimilate into each of these roles, only then will value intertwined into information literacy change information behaviors and potentially transform a community learners.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Forum Newsletter

    Co-Editors
    Reba Tierney and
    ​Luke Steere

    Reba is the School Librarian at Waltham High School; Luke is School Librarian at  Wilson Middle in Natick

    Click to set custom HTML

    Categories

    All
    AASL
    Academic
    Advocacy
    ALA
    Authors
    Book Trailers
    Censorship
    Column
    Conference
    Culture
    Databases
    Dewey
    Digital Citizenship
    E Books
    E-books
    Elementary
    ESSA
    Ethics
    Evaluation
    Inquiry
    Leadership
    Learning Commons
    Legislation
    Literacy
    Maker Space
    Nonfiction
    Orientation
    Planning
    PLN
    President's Remarks
    Professional Development
    Reading
    Science
    Secondary
    Standards
    Technology
    Union
    Volunteers
    Weeding

    Archives

    October 2022
    May 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    May 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    May 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    November 2015
    April 2015

    MSLA Forum Past Issues:
    January 2015
    April 2015
    ​
    2002-2015 MSLA Forum
The Massachusetts School Library Association  works to ensure every school has a school library program that is fully integrated at all grade levels across the curriculum and has a significant and measurable impact on student achievement….Read more…..and Learn more about MSLA

Contact MSLA:
Emily Kristofek, Office Manager/Event Planner
P.O. Box 336. Wayland, MA 01778
ekristofek@maschoolibraries.org
​
508-276-1697 

Massachusetts School Library Association. All Rights Reserved.  Copyright 2023.