Massachusetts School Library Association
            MEMBER PORTAL                
​Join or Renew     Member Directory​
  • Home
  • About Us
    • MSLA Leadership 2022-23
    • Executive Board Meetings
    • Joint Statements: MLA, MassCUE
    • Spotlight Archive
    • Strategic Plan 2016-22
    • MSLA Constitution
  • Membership
    • Member Portal
    • Join or Renew Your Membership
    • Members Map
    • Email List
    • Regions >
      • Boston
      • Northeast
      • Metrowest
      • Southeast
      • Central
      • West
  • Conference
    • MSLA and PDPs
  • Resources
    • DESE Rubric
    • Certification & Licensure
    • Program Standards & Rubrics
    • Job Description: School Librarian
    • Job Listings
    • MLS Strategic Planning
    • Intellectual Freedom
  • Advocacy
    • MA School Library Study for Equity & Access
    • Everyday Advocacy
    • ESSA
    • Exemplary Programs
  • Newsletter
    • 2023 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2023
    • 2022 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2022
      • May 2022
      • October 2022
    • 2021 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2021
      • May 2021
      • October 2021
    • 2020 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2020
      • May 2020
      • October 2020
    • 2019 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2019
      • May 2019
      • October 2019
    • 2018 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2018
      • May 2018
      • October 2018
    • 2017 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2017
      • May 2017
      • September 2017
      • October 2017
    • 2016 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • February 2016
      • May 2016
      • October 2016
    • 2015 MSLA Forum Issues >
      • April 2015
      • November 2015
    • MSLA Forum 2002-2013
  • Awards
    • Judi Paradis Memorial Grant
    • Archive: History of Awards
    • 2019 Awards Pictures
    • 2018 Awards Pictures
    • 2017 Awards Pictures
    • 2016 Awards Pictures
    • 2015 Awards Pictures
  • Bookmark Contest
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2020 Winners
    • 2019 and 2018 Winners
    • 2016 and 2017 Winners
    • 2012 to 2015 Winners
    • 2009 to 2011 Winners
    • 2004 to 2008 Winners
    • Bookmark Judges

Cataloging Column: The black hole of Dewey literature classes: the 800s explained and simplified

5/17/2022

0 Comments

 
Gillian Bartoo is the District Cataloger for Cambridge Public Schools in Cambridge, MA

As I stated in my previous column Dewey, even “simplified” Dewey, tends to be far too academic and detailed for most K-8 libraries and, in some ranges, even at the high school level. The younger the patrons of the library, the more willing we need to be to go off Dewey without totally scrapping it. I cling to Dewey in general because I think there is real value in teaching students universally predictable systems of organization, particularly in a world that is increasingly organized with proprietary algorithms and taxonomies that are often complex. Using Dewey is one of the ways that we teach and model logic, pattern, and organizational principles. It makes the students independent users in any library that uses Dewey and prepares them for more complex book organizational systems like Library of Congress Classification.
I do a lot of weeding and inventory projects in our district. I run a lot of reports on circulation and usage. I catalog a lot of books. There are some areas of Dewey that I always think of as “black holes”— those Dewey numbers or ranges where, if you catalog a book to that area, you know nobody is ever going to find it. Now, theoretically, with an online catalog you could put books anywhere and find them with an appropriate catalog search. That assumes the catalog search terms are present and accurate, the shelving number in the catalog and book tagging match, and that everything is shelved correctly. This was the original idea behind Dewey— a highly controlled, closed stack system where only trained librarians accessed the books.

With open shelves and subject browsing, a lack of browsing and searching time, issues with technology access, and youth’s lack of familiarity with the technology, the catalog is often the last place patrons go to find something. School librarians frequently rely on their own memories and knowledge of the collection and patrons rely on browsing within subject areas. If a book is cataloged to one of these “black holes” of Dewey, it usually gets missed. I find that the literature— the 800s— is a prime example of a Dewey black hole.

800 BREAKDOWN
Most literature call numbers in an American school library fall between 800-829 which encompass general and collected works regardless of origin (800-809), American and Canadian literature in English (810-819), and English and Commonwealth literature originally written in English (820-829). All other European literatures are broken down by language family in 830-880 and other “world” literatures in 890-899.  Within those ranges literature is broken down by genre and then by century. “Collections” are further designated by .08 or .008 depending on the rules in the manual. The genre breakdown is this:

8X0 – general and collected works 
8X1 – poetry and its history and criticism
8X2 – drama and its history and criticism
8X3 or, usually, [Fic] – fiction and its history and criticism
8X4 – essays
8X5 – speeches
8X6 – letters
8X7 – humor and satire
8X8 – miscellaneous
8X9 – specific local

Seems simple enough, but in most school libraries your shelflist looks something like this:

808 – “how to write books”, and collections and short stories
808.008 – collections and short stories
808.8 – collections and short stories
810 – collections and short stories
810.008 – collections and short stories
810.8 – collections and short stories
811 – poetry
811.008 – poetry collections
811.08 – poetry collections
811.5-811.6 – poetry
812 – 812.6 – plays
813-813.6 – random books about famous books or authors; maybe a classic novel or two; short stories
818 – joke and riddle books
819 – random, weird stuff (that should probably be weeded!)

The 820s breaks down pretty much the same way, only less numerous and with a bunch of Shakespeare related things at 822. The rest of the range, 830-899 holds a few tales from Homer and other writers, a few bilingual or foreign language titles, some translations from China or Japan, and one or two titles written by Native Americans. Basically, it may be a mess. Below are some simple suggestions to bring some order to the chaos.

FICTION
All titles that end up [Fic] do have a Dewey number. It’s generally 813 with a sprinkling of the other 8X3’s thrown in here and there depending on what language and/or where the text was originally written. For ease of understanding at this point almost all novel-length fiction written in English is universally cataloged as [Fic] when Library of Congress catalogers are assigning Dewey classes. You may get exceptions for very old titles that were originally cataloged with the Dewey number and some translations or adaptations of plays into novels may show up in another 8X3 number.

My Recommendation: For any 8X3 title that is just a prose story or novel in verse written in English, and is not history or criticism, catalog to Fiction. In a K-8 library, move a book of history or criticism to 809. At the high school level leave history and criticism as cataloged.

A note on non-English fiction collections: If it’s bilingual, put it in Fiction, otherwise, leave it in the 8X3. If you have a large non-English collection of fiction, especially if you are serving a bilingual or immersion program you may want to establish a separate “Fiction” collection in that language rather than using a Dewey number. In Cambridge we have Spanish, Portuguese, and Chinese sublocations in our bilingual immersion schools with FIC as the fiction call number.

POETRY
Lately I’ve been recommending to librarians that they just move any English-language poetry categorized in 8X1 to 811 (.008 if it’s a collection of multiple authors). It’s up to you what you want to do with any bilingual or non-English language titles. In Cambridge bilingual titles go into 811 and we leave non-English titles in their Dewey classes. The decimal within poetry (roughly 8X1.3-8X1.6) denotes the century the author wrote most of their works in, in American and English literature classes.  For American poetry the breakdown you may see is:

.4 – 19th century
.5  - 20th century
.52 - early 20th century
.54 - late 20th century
.6 - 21st century

My Recommendation:
in K-8 schools catalog to 811.  In high schools it’s up to you. I catalog to the second decimal place. I don’t think the librarians are happy about that, but I used to be an English major so I can’t help it. I promise I’ll come around eventually.

SHORT STORIES and OTHER COLLECTIONS
My god, what a chaotic incomprehensible mess! It seems like squirrels have cataloged this stuff, am I right? It’s all over the place, that’s because cataloging collections depends on language, geographical and/or historical origins of the pieces, genre, author or authors, theme or survey of the overall collection, skill and depth of subject knowledge of the cataloger, and local practices. Actually, ALL cataloging depends on those things and more, but literature collections seem to never get cataloged the same title the same way.
 

My Recommendation: just pick a number or a scheme for however you want to break it down and stick with it. In Cambridge K-8 libraries, our breakdown is roughly this:

808 – books on “how to write”
808.8 – short story collections by more than one author
[Fic] – short story collections or collected works by the same author (if known primarily for prose)
810.8 – collections of more than one type of literary genre by more than one author
811.008 – poetry collections by more than one author
811 – poetry by one author in English

Our high school collection is more complex and, admittedly, not very coherent. It’s a project we haven’t the energy to tackle right now. If a Cambridge school serves a bilingual or immersion population, literature in that language runs roughly the same way within that language’s literature number. I tend to leave out the decimal designators, .8 or .008, in non-English collections because they aren’t big enough to be worth the parsing and, as stated before, we use FIC rather than an 8X3 number.  “SC” or “Story” instead of or in addition to a Dewey number is fine. Go with what works for short stories.

OTHER 82X-89X NUMBERS

My Recommendation:
For plays, jokes and other things in English that end up outside of 800-819 I recommend just moving them into [Fic] if it’s a novel or the corresponding 81X number. For criticism and history move to 809.

As I said at the beginning, these are just my personal recommendations for how to make an overly complicated system more accessible to students and teachers alike without reinventing the wheel or going completely rogue. How you handle literatures and genres in any given library depends on collection and population. If you’ve figured out a good way to handle literature in your library, let me know. Leave a comment. 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Forum Newsletter

    Co-Editors
    Reba Tierney and
    ​Luke Steere

    Reba is the School Librarian at Waltham High School; Luke is School Librarian at  Wilson Middle in Natick

    Click to set custom HTML

    Categories

    All
    AASL
    Academic
    Advocacy
    ALA
    Authors
    Book Bans
    Book Challenges
    Book Trailers
    Cataloging
    Censorship
    Column
    Conference
    Copyright
    Culture
    Databases
    Dewey
    Digital Citizenship
    E Books
    E-books
    Elementary
    ESSA
    Ethics
    Evaluation
    Graphic Books
    Graphic Novels
    Inquiry
    Leadership
    Learning Commons
    Legislation
    Literacy
    Maker Space
    Nonfiction
    Orientation
    Planning
    PLN
    President's Remarks
    Professional Development
    Reading
    Research
    Science
    Secondary
    Standards
    Technology
    Union
    Volunteers
    Weeding

    Archives

    February 2023
    October 2022
    May 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    May 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    May 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    November 2015
    April 2015

    MSLA Forum Past Issues:
    January 2015
    April 2015
    ​
    2002-2015 MSLA Forum
The Massachusetts School Library Association  works to ensure every school has a school library program that is fully integrated at all grade levels across the curriculum and has a significant and measurable impact on student achievement….Read more…..and Learn more about MSLA

Contact MSLA:
Emily Kristofek, Office Manager/Event Planner
P.O. Box 336. Wayland, MA 01778
ekristofek@maschoolibraries.org
​
508-276-1697 

Massachusetts School Library Association. All Rights Reserved.  Copyright 2023.